THE PERMIT STACK
A Maryland resident seeking to maximize interstate concealed carry privileges must execute a deliberate, multi-jurisdictional strategy often referred to as the "Permit Stack." This approach leverages permits issued by states with broad reciprocity agreements that also offer non-resident options.
There are two legal prerequisites:
-
The statutory acceptance of nationally recognized training organizations
- National Rifle Association (NRA)
- United States Concealed Carry Association (USCCA)
- True scope of reciprocity afforded by non-resident permits.
Verification of Core Legal Premises
Nationally standardized training certifications provide a reliable foundation for obtaining crucial expansion permits. Both NRA and USCCA certifications are verified as statutory proof of competence in key states that issue high-utility non-resident permits, such as Virginia. This standardized training alleviates a significant compliance barrier for applicants.
The strategic “Permit Stack” for maximum legal coverage, is constructed upon the foundational Maryland Wear and Carry Permit (WCP), supplemented by the Virginia Non-Resident Concealed Handgun Permit (CHP), the Utah Non-Resident Concealed Firearm Permit (CFP), and the Florida Non-Resident Concealed Weapon License (CWL).
However, a detailed review of state statutes reveals that the number of states offering concealed carry privileges is significantly curtailed by jurisdictional policies that specifically reject permits issued to non-residents. This restrictive practice is commonly referred to as the "Resident-Only" barrier.
Therefore, the maximum legal reach is determined not simply by the list of reciprocating states, but by the complex interaction of the issuing state's policy and the recognizing state's statutory acceptance criteria.
Optimal Permit Portfolio Strategy for Maryland Residents (The "Stack")
The optimal concealed carry permit portfolio requires a hierarchical approach, starting with the home state permit (MD) and strategically adding non-resident permits based on ease of acquisition, cost-effectiveness, and geographic reach.
1. Maryland Wear and Carry Permit (WCP)
The Maryland WCP establishes the legal right to carry within the home state, which is required as a baseline. Furthermore, obtaining the WCP is a necessary precursor for the application process in other strategic jurisdictions. Specifically, Utah mandates that applicants residing in states that issue concealed carry permits must possess their home state permit before applying for the Utah non-resident CFP.
2. Virginia Non-Resident CHP
Virginia statute broadly accepts training courses from any National Rifle Association or United States Concealed Carry Association firearms safety or training course. This broad acceptance simplifies the application process significantly, providing the most practical entry point for non-resident permit expansion.
3. Utah Non-Resident CFP
The Utah Non-Resident CFP is crucial for maximizing coverage across the Western and Midwest United States. It offers extensive reciprocity requiring only classroom instruction.
However, as noted, the Maryland resident must first secure the MD WCP to satisfy Utah’s prerequisite that applicants from reciprocal states must hold their home state permit.
The Permit Stack Diminishing Return
While the permit stack provides comprehensive coverage, the marginal value of adding additional non-resident permits decreases after acquiring the primary three (MD, VA, UT).
The combination of the Maryland, Virginia, Utah, and Florida permits effectively covers all jurisdictions classified as Constitutional Carry (CC) states.
The true measure of a permit’s utility is the coverage it provides in the remaining “Permit Required” states. These states often have strict reciprocity laws. Key states such as Colorado and Michigan explicitly reject concealed carry permits issued to non-residents, irrespective of the issuing state's reputation.
Since these critical jurisdictions cannot be legally accessed using non-resident status, obtaining the third or fourth non-resident permit yields only minor, specific jurisdictional increases, failing to achieve proportional, overall contiguous coverage.
The Maryland Carry Baseline and Necessary Foundation
The foundation of the multi-state carry strategy rests entirely on the Maryland resident's legal standing in their home state and the subsequent utility of that home state permit in the broader national landscape.
A. Maryland WCP Issuance and Requirements
Any individual who wishes to legally wear, carry, or transport a handgun in Maryland is required to possess a valid Maryland Handgun Wear and Carry Permit (WCP) issued by the Maryland Department of State Police (MSP). Applicants must be at least 21 years of age, or a member of the U.S. Armed Forces, National Guard, or uniformed services. The application process is entirely electronic, managed through the MSP Licensing Portal. The criteria for issuance also include prohibitions against conviction of felonies, certain misdemeanors, drug offenses, and evidence of propensity for violence or instability. Furthermore, applicants must successfully complete an MSP-approved firearms training course within two years prior to submitting the application, unless specifically exempt.
B. MD WCP Reciprocity Footprint and Limitations
The Maryland WCP is recognized by approximately 25 states. Most states that honor the MD permit are classified as Constitutional Carry (CC) states, including jurisdictions like Texas, Tennessee, Alabama, and Idaho.
C. Contradiction Analysis: Reciprocity Listing Discrepancy - BE CAREFUL!
Some reciprocity databases may list South Carolina (SC) as a state that does not formally honor the MD WCP. Concurrently, other sources correctly identify SC as a state that has enacted Constitutional Carry.
Effective March 7, 2024, South Carolina implemented Permitless Carry, meaning that carrying a firearm, openly or concealed, is generally legal for those not otherwise prohibited, rendering statutory reciprocity agreements (formal honor agreements) largely irrelevant for standard carry.
Thus, the designation that SC "does not honor" the MD WCP is either an outdated reference to the lack of a formal agreement or a failure to account for the constitutional carry law change, but it does not prohibit the Maryland resident from carrying legally in SC under the state's internal law.
Training Credential Verification: NRA and USCCA Statutory Acceptance
A. Virginia
Virginia’s statute provides the most flexible acceptance standard for training. Virginia Code § 18.2-308.06, governing nonresident concealed handgun permits, explicitly lists several forms of training competence. Among these are: completing any National Rifle Association or United States Concealed Carry Association firearms safety or training course; completing any in-person firearms training or safety course conducted by a state-certified, National Rifle Association-certified, or United States Concealed Carry Association-certified firearms instructor; or completing a hunter education or safety course.
This exceptionally broad statutory language confirms that Virginia is the easiest practical non-resident permit to acquire, as it validates most forms of certified training, potentially including hybrid online/in-person training structures, so long as the certification originates from or is recognized by the NRA or USCCA.
B. Florida: Detailed Course Specification
Florida’s requirements for its non-resident Concealed Weapon License (CWL) are more specific. Florida accepts formal training or instruction, listing acceptable evidence such as an Honorable Discharge from military service or the NRA Basic Pistol Course.
C. Connecticut and the Live-Fire Mandate
While generally difficult to obtain, Connecticut does offer a non-resident permit. The statutory requirements emphasize practical skill demonstration. Connecticut mandates a handgun safety course that must consist of no less than the NRA’s "Basic Pistol Course". Critically, Connecticut explicitly requires live fire. The statute clarifies that computer-generated programs, dry-fire, simulated shooting tools, plastic bullets, or air guns are not acceptable substitutes. Students must fire either a semi-automatic pistol or a revolver.
This compliance distinction is crucial for the Maryland applicant: a course that may qualify for Virginia or Utah (which may accept classroom-only or hybrid formats) will fail to qualify for Connecticut if it lacks the mandatory live-fire component. The applicant must ensure that the specific NRA training chosen included verifiable live range time to meet CT’s rigorous standard.
D. Iowa Training Acceptance
Iowa, which issues non-resident permits , maintains a training standard similar to Virginia in its breadth. A new applicant is required to demonstrate they have completed any NRA safety training course or a course offered by other recognized firearms trainers, including the U.S. military. Further verification from the Department of Public Safety confirms acceptance of any handgun safety training course utilizing instructors certified by the National Rifle Association or an approved organization.
Strategic Permit Portfolio: Non-Resident Expansion Mechanisms
A. Virginia Non-Resident CHP
The Virginia Non-Resident CHP is secured by applying directly through the Virginia State Police (VSP) Firearms Transaction Center. This process is streamlined because Virginia honors all valid out-of-state concealed carry permits and issues its own permits to non-residents who are at least 21 years old and demonstrate competence with a firearm. The primary utility of this permit is providing reliable coverage in mid-Atlantic and Northeast states that maintain reciprocity agreements with Virginia but do not honor the Maryland WCP.
B. Utah Non-Resident CFP
The Utah Non-Resident CFP is highly sought after for its extensive reach, recognizing permits from 36 other states. The application process for a non-resident in Utah involves submitting a photocopy of a state-issued driver’s license, a photograph, and a fingerprint card.
The critical procedural requirement for a Maryland resident, however, is the Mandatory Home State Permit (Prerequisite Compliance). Utah law requires that if an applicant resides in a state that recognizes the validity of the Utah CFP or has reciprocity with Utah (which includes Maryland), the applicant must first obtain a CFP or CCW from their home state and submit a copy of it with the Utah application. This establishes a clear causal relationship: the Maryland resident must possess the MD WCP before they can successfully apply for the Utah CFP. Failure to meet this home-state permit requirement, even if the training is completed, will lead to application denial or processing delays.
A notable advantage of the Utah CFP is the Training Advantage. The statutory training requirement in Utah involves a four-hour classroom lecture with no mandated live fire or range qualification. This low-friction training standard facilitates faster non-resident acquisition, provided the MD WCP prerequisite is met.
C. Florida Non-Resident CWL
The Florida Non-Resident CWL is important for covering specific jurisdictional gaps. Florida is a shall-issue state for non-residents, and the permit is issued by the Florida Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services. The training proof requirements include successful completion of an appropriate firearms safety course, such as the NRA Basic Pistol Course (Phase 1 and 2), or possession of a valid current or expired concealed weapon license from another state that required training.
Statutory Definition and Implementation
The "Resident-Only" rule stipulates that reciprocity is only granted if the permit holder is a legal resident of the state that issued the permit.
This means that a Virginia Non-Resident CHP held by a Maryland resident is invalid in any state that enforces this statute.
Impact on Strategic Permits (Specific Jurisdictional Failures)
The enforcement of "Resident-Only" rules creates systematic failures for the Maryland permit holder in several critical states:
- Florida’s Internal Contradiction: Although Florida issues its own CWL to non-residents, it limits its recognition of permits issued by third-party states.
- Utah’s reciprocal list, for instance, confirms that Florida only honors the Utah CFP if the permit holder is a resident of Utah. This demonstrates that while the MD resident can obtain a Florida non-resident permit, they cannot necessarily rely on their Utah non-resident permit for coverage in Florida, highlighting the need for the Florida permit in the stack.
- Michigan’s policies typically reject non-resident permits. Michigan law requires that an applicant for a Concealed Pistol License (CPL) be a legal resident of Michigan and reside there for at least six months prior to application, effectively eliminating most non-resident carry options. Reciprocity lists reflecting this policy show that Michigan often only honors other states' permits if the holder is a resident of that state.
- In sharp contrast, Wisconsin provides a permissive exception to the non-resident rule. Wisconsin explicitly recognizes and honors valid concealed carry permits held by individuals who are not Wisconsin residents, provided they are at least 21 years of age.
This differentiation between Michigan and Wisconsin necessitates careful preparation when traveling between these two seemingly similar Midwestern jurisdictions.
- Colorado enforces the residency test, the non-resident permits fail. The only way for the Maryland resident to legally carry concealed in Colorado is to establish residency there and obtain a resident permit.
The Maryland resident must regard these states as “No-Go” zones for concealed carry, regardless of the number of non-resident permits held.
Jurisdictional Outliers and High-Risk Travel Zones
While the strategic portfolio provides broad coverage, certain jurisdictions near Maryland or along common travel routes maintain uniquely restrictive requirements, demanding specific compliance strategies.
Washington D.C. (The Zero-Reciprocity Zone)
The District of Columbia operates as a strict "Zero-Reciprocity" zone, honoring no concealed carry licenses from any state or subdivision of the United States. Traveling within D.C. requires extreme caution.
Although D.C. does not honor external permits, a Maryland resident can apply for a D.C. Concealed Carry Pistol License (CCPL). The requirements state that if the applicant does not reside or work in the District, they must live or work in another state and possess a valid concealed carry permit from that state.
The primary barrier to compliance is the Mandatory Training Barrier. D.C. requires applicants to complete specialized training on D.C. law administered by an MPD-certified instructor. Therefore, possession of the MD WCP or NRA/USCCA certificates does not satisfy the training mandate, necessitating a separate, high-barrier application process to legally carry within the District.
The Northeast Corridor (NJ, NY, IL, HI)
Jurisdictions located along the Northeast corridor, including New Jersey, New York, and other restrictive states like Illinois, typically do not issue non-resident permits and do not honor permits from Maryland, Virginia, Utah, or Florida.
For travel through these high-risk areas, the Maryland resident must strictly adhere to the Federal Firearm Owners Protection Act (FOPA).
Comprehensive Compliance Recommendations and Final Legal Assessment
The successful management of a multi-state concealed carry portfolio demands not only the acquisition of the correct permits but also rigorous adherence to procedural and location-specific compliance rules.
Documentation and Procedural Compliance
The permit holder must carry the Maryland WCP, all valid non-resident permits (VA, UT, FL), and a government-issued photo identification (typically a driver's license or ID card) at all times when carrying a concealed handgun in the Commonwealth and reciprocal states. The identification must be displayed, along with the permit, upon demand by a law-enforcement officer.
A mandatory compliance warning must be emphasized: reciprocity agreements only confer the right to carry a concealed handgun in a recognizing jurisdiction. They do not grant immunity from local place restrictions. The Maryland resident, when carrying in a reciprocal state, is subject to all local laws and restrictions specific to that
Conclusion on State Count
Based on the strategic portfolio (MD WCP + VA CHP + UT CFP + FL CWL), and accounting for states that have adopted Permitless Carry (e.g., Alabama, Arizona, Texas, Arkansas, South Carolina) where the permit is not required but still strategically valuable for compliance, the effective coverage for the Maryland resident approaches 38 to 40 states.
However, a precise assessment of the "Permit Required" states where the non-resident permit provides lawful concealed carry authority yields a significantly lower figure. When jurisdictions such as Colorado, Michigan, and Oregon (due to their "Resident-Only" statutes or border-state issuance restrictions) are systematically excluded from the calculation, the number of states where the non-resident permit confers legal carrying authority falls closer to 30. The legal reality is that the ease of obtaining non-resident permits, facilitated by standardized NRA/USCCA training, is often counterbalanced by explicit statutory prohibitions in restrictive states designed to limit interstate recognition based on residency.
Disclaimer: The information provided by HARP Firearms Training & Defense (“HARP FTD”) is for educational and informational purposes only and should not be construed as legal advice, tactical guidance, or an endorsement of any specific action. Firearm laws and self-defense statutes vary by jurisdiction and may change over time. Readers are strongly encouraged to consult applicable state and federal laws and seek professional legal counsel before relying on or acting upon any information contained in this post. Participation in any firearm-related activity carries inherent risks. Always follow all firearm safety rules, comply with local laws, and receive proper training from certified instructors. HARP FTD, its owners, instructors, and affiliates assume no liability for any loss, injury, or legal consequence arising from the use or misuse of the information provided herein.